-28.9%
RBLX vs GFS
+0.4%
-29.3%
-43.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +1.9% | -2.6% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +8.0% | +4.5% | +3.5% | +7.9% |
| 30D | +20.2% | -8.2% | +28.4% | +20.5% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -38.9% | +42.4% | +4.5% |
| 6M | -28.9% | -2.9% | -26.1% | -36.0% |
| All | -28.9% | +0.4% | -29.3% | -36.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling