+57.2%
RBLX vs EAT
+585.9%
-528.7%
-74.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.3% | +1.1% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -6.2% | +14.3% | +9.4% |
| 30D | +23.9% | -3.0% | +26.9% | +24.1% |
| 3M | +8.1% | +45.6% | -37.5% | -1.3% |
| 6M | -23.7% | +53.5% | -77.3% | -31.7% |
| YTD | -44.6% | +49.6% | -94.2% | -50.2% |
| 1Y | -66.2% | +38.9% | -105.1% | -69.3% |
| All | +57.2% | +585.9% | -528.7% | +10.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling