-46.2%
QXO vs ZETA
+269.4%
-315.6%
-95.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -1.2% | +1.4% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -7.8% | -3.7% | -4.1% | -7.4% |
| 30D | -18.1% | +5.7% | -23.8% | -18.7% |
| 3M | -25.8% | +50.4% | -76.2% | -29.3% |
| 6M | -41.7% | +65.5% | -107.2% | -45.5% |
| YTD | -36.2% | +48.3% | -84.5% | -39.8% |
| 1Y | -42.1% | +45.4% | -87.5% | -45.4% |
| 3Y | -46.2% | +270.8% | -316.9% | -40.5% |
| All | -46.2% | +269.4% | -315.6% | -40.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling