-46.2%
QXO vs NIO
-64.5%
+18.3%
-95.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +3.1% | -2.9% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -7.8% | -2.9% | -4.9% | -7.5% |
| 30D | -18.1% | -18.7% | +0.6% | -16.4% |
| 3M | -25.8% | -29.4% | +3.7% | -23.3% |
| 6M | -41.7% | -32.5% | -9.2% | -39.6% |
| YTD | -36.2% | -27.6% | -8.5% | -34.4% |
| 1Y | -42.1% | -39.2% | -2.9% | -39.7% |
| 3Y | -46.2% | -64.3% | +18.1% | -38.6% |
| All | -46.2% | -64.5% | +18.3% | -38.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling