-41.5%
QXO vs HTZ
-86.1%
+44.6%
-95.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -5.0% | +4.3% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -2.5% | +5.3% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -18.0% | -3.7% | -14.3% | -18.0% |
| 3M | -14.7% | -57.0% | +42.3% | -12.8% |
| 6M | -39.2% | -47.0% | +7.7% | -38.1% |
| YTD | -31.3% | -57.5% | +26.2% | -29.7% |
| 1Y | -39.7% | -63.5% | +23.8% | -38.1% |
| 3Y | -41.5% | -86.3% | +44.8% | -25.1% |
| All | -41.5% | -86.1% | +44.6% | -25.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling