+67.5%
QQQM vs UMAC
+473.8%
-406.3%
-22.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -2.5% | +3.4% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -3.4% | +2.8% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -15.1% | +13.9% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -0.1% | -10.8% | +10.7% | -0.3% |
| 6M | +18.0% | +15.7% | +2.3% | +15.8% |
| YTD | +16.7% | +80.1% | -63.5% | +12.8% |
| 1Y | +23.0% | +116.7% | -93.7% | +18.0% |
| All | +67.5% | +473.8% | -406.3% | +56.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling