+176.1%
QLD vs PHM
+54.8%
+121.2%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PHM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -3.2% | +3.8% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -6.4% | +6.3% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -8.4% | +5.5% | -13.9% | -10.9% |
| 6M | +32.2% | -5.4% | +37.7% | +33.5% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +6.6% | +22.3% | +23.5% |
| 1Y | +43.8% | -8.8% | +52.7% | +46.0% |
| All | +176.1% | +54.8% | +121.2% | +91.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PHM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PHM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PHM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PHM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling