+133.5%
QLD vs PH
+128.8%
+4.7%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.7% | -2.0% | -10.8% | -11.1% |
| 7D | -18.6% | -3.9% | -14.7% | -15.8% |
| 30D | -28.3% | -9.4% | -18.9% | -22.3% |
| 3M | -20.4% | -10.3% | -10.1% | -13.7% |
| 6M | -14.3% | +2.7% | -17.0% | -17.5% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +2.1% | +0.6% | -2.3% |
| 1Y | -1.2% | +16.2% | -17.4% | -17.6% |
| All | +133.5% | +128.8% | +4.7% | +14.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling