+65.3%
QLD vs MULL
+2,561.4%
-2,496.0%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +11.8% | -11.5% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +17.3% | -16.7% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -0.1% | +23.5% | -23.6% | -5.2% |
| 3M | -8.4% | -24.0% | +15.6% | -11.1% |
| 6M | +32.2% | +276.7% | -244.5% | -16.6% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +565.1% | -536.2% | -32.2% |
| 1Y | +43.8% | +2,802.6% | -2,758.8% | -52.8% |
| All | +65.3% | +2,561.4% | -2,496.0% | -54.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling