+176.1%
QLD vs LSCC
+20.0%
+156.1%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +2.0% | -1.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +1.3% | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -9.7% | +9.5% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -8.4% | -23.7% | +15.3% | +3.2% |
| 6M | +32.2% | +26.5% | +5.7% | +17.2% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +57.5% | -28.6% | +1.7% |
| 1Y | +43.8% | +75.7% | -31.9% | +6.9% |
| All | +176.1% | +20.0% | +156.1% | +118.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling