+176.1%
QLD vs ECHO
+423.0%
-246.9%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +3.4% | -2.8% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -0.1% | +2.4% | -2.5% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -8.4% | -28.0% | +19.6% | -5.2% |
| 6M | +32.2% | -21.2% | +53.5% | +35.1% |
| YTD | +28.9% | -17.4% | +46.3% | +30.8% |
| 1Y | +43.8% | +33.6% | +10.2% | +39.0% |
| All | +176.1% | +423.0% | -246.9% | +123.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling