+70.9%
QCOM vs PGR
+73.8%
-2.9%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -3.4% | +8.4% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +9.3% | +1.8% | +7.5% | +9.7% |
| 3M | -7.0% | +5.9% | -12.9% | -5.8% |
| 6M | +32.0% | +4.6% | +27.5% | +34.1% |
| YTD | +5.0% | +1.1% | +4.0% | +6.5% |
| 1Y | +13.6% | -6.6% | +20.2% | +15.4% |
| All | +70.9% | +73.8% | -2.9% | +107.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling