+39.3%
QCOM vs HTZ
-81.0%
+120.2%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.5% | -20.8% | +11.3% | -7.5% |
| 7D | -15.5% | -7.7% | -7.7% | -14.8% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -13.1% | -0.3% | -12.4% |
| 3M | 0.0% | +14.7% | -14.7% | -2.3% |
| 6M | -15.2% | -70.6% | +55.4% | -7.7% |
| YTD | -6.9% | -65.2% | +58.2% | -0.3% |
| 1Y | -11.0% | -73.2% | +62.2% | -3.2% |
| All | +39.3% | -81.0% | +120.2% | +51.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling