+48.4%
QCOM vs FROG
+335.2%
-286.9%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | +2.7% | -5.3% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +4.3% | +12.5% | -8.2% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -0.1% | +23.5% | -23.6% | -4.2% |
| 3M | +5.2% | +19.4% | -14.2% | +1.0% |
| 6M | -18.4% | +77.0% | -95.4% | -26.6% |
| YTD | +2.4% | +81.9% | -79.5% | -9.8% |
| 1Y | +0.9% | +90.7% | -89.8% | -11.8% |
| 3Y | +48.4% | +328.5% | -280.1% | +7.0% |
| All | +48.4% | +335.2% | -286.9% | +7.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling