+2.3%
QCOM vs FROG
+83.7%
-81.4%
-41.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -2.4% | +7.8% | +5.6% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -14.1% | +8.7% | -3.7% |
| 30D | -4.2% | -11.8% | +7.6% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +7.0% | +0.1% | +6.9% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +3.8% | +64.2% | -60.4% | -1.8% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +38.2% | -35.4% | -3.8% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | +85.4% | -83.1% | -3.6% |
| All | +2.3% | +83.7% | -81.4% | -3.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling