+11.2%
QCOM vs ECHO
+260.3%
-249.1%
-44.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | +5.2% | +0.3% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -2.4% | +2.8% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -6.6% | -3.1% | -3.5% | -6.3% |
| 3M | +3.7% | +8.7% | -5.0% | +2.7% |
| 6M | -13.3% | -24.8% | +11.4% | -11.2% |
| YTD | -1.8% | -13.0% | +11.2% | -1.4% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | +33.9% | -36.4% | -6.5% |
| 3Y | +47.0% | +791.8% | -744.8% | +0.7% |
| All | +11.2% | +260.3% | -249.1% | -12.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling