+1,457.0%
QBTS vs NCLH
-12.2%
+1,469.2%
-71.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -1.9% | -0.8% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -6.5% | +5.6% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -17.6% | -22.1% | +4.4% | -8.5% |
| 3M | -28.3% | -18.7% | -9.6% | -22.4% |
| 6M | -11.2% | -28.4% | +17.2% | +1.0% |
| YTD | -36.3% | -34.7% | -1.6% | -26.5% |
| 1Y | +3.9% | -42.7% | +46.6% | +26.3% |
| All | +1,457.0% | -12.2% | +1,469.2% | +1,225.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling