-55.2%
QBTS vs LII
-36.0%
-19.2%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +18.0% | -2.0% | +20.0% | +18.6% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -0.6% | +0.9% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -29.8% | -4.6% | -25.2% | -28.9% |
| 3M | -45.0% | -21.2% | -23.7% | -40.1% |
| 6M | -55.2% | -36.4% | -18.7% | -48.3% |
| All | -55.2% | -36.0% | -19.2% | -48.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling