-68.1%
QBTS vs GLDM
+2.6%
-70.7%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.8% | +0.8% | -13.7% | -13.7% |
| 7D | -21.7% | +1.9% | -23.6% | -23.4% |
| 30D | -42.7% | -1.7% | -41.0% | -41.5% |
| 3M | -57.7% | -3.5% | -54.2% | -55.9% |
| 6M | -58.0% | -10.1% | -47.9% | -52.4% |
| YTD | -65.4% | -5.0% | -60.3% | -60.2% |
| All | -68.1% | +2.6% | -70.7% | -67.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling