-12.8%
PYPL vs PCG
-11.7%
-1.1%
-57.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +2.4% | -5.5% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -13.9% | +16.5% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -4.9% | -16.9% | +12.0% | -0.6% |
| 3M | +28.9% | -14.7% | +43.6% | +33.8% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -23.8% | +42.1% | +26.1% |
| YTD | -5.0% | -10.5% | +5.5% | -3.4% |
| 1Y | -18.8% | -5.1% | -13.7% | -19.2% |
| All | -12.8% | -11.7% | -1.1% | -11.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling