+9.1%
PYPL vs HTZ
-81.0%
+90.1%
-57.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -20.8% | +18.7% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.5% | -7.7% | +11.3% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +8.0% | -13.1% | +21.1% | +8.5% |
| 3M | +2.0% | +14.7% | -12.7% | +0.3% |
| 6M | +27.6% | -70.6% | +98.2% | +33.9% |
| YTD | +1.9% | -65.2% | +67.1% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | -12.4% | -73.2% | +60.8% | -8.2% |
| All | +9.1% | -81.0% | +90.1% | +20.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling