-77.7%
PYPL vs FLNC
-69.8%
-7.9%
-83.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -8.3% | +6.4% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -4.3% | -4.2% | -0.2% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -11.5% | -20.0% | +8.5% | -9.3% |
| 3M | +26.1% | -56.9% | +83.0% | +37.2% |
| 6M | +13.7% | -35.5% | +49.2% | +13.4% |
| YTD | -9.8% | -48.8% | +39.0% | -9.4% |
| 1Y | -22.1% | +49.3% | -71.3% | -36.9% |
| 3Y | -13.5% | -61.8% | +48.3% | -22.6% |
| All | -77.7% | -69.8% | -7.9% | -83.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling