-13.2%
PYPL vs ENPH
-68.3%
+55.1%
-57.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +6.8% | -10.0% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +9.3% | -7.5% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -9.7% | -7.3% | -2.5% | -9.3% |
| 3M | +29.2% | -31.7% | +60.9% | +32.6% |
| 6M | +13.9% | -3.5% | +17.4% | +12.3% |
| YTD | -8.1% | +21.2% | -29.3% | -12.6% |
| 1Y | -21.4% | +0.1% | -21.4% | -23.9% |
| All | -13.2% | -68.3% | +55.1% | -9.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling