+206.9%
PWR vs NCLH
-10.5%
+217.4%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -3.5% | +1.6% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -4.6% | +7.3% | +3.5% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -19.9% | +14.8% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -9.4% | -22.0% | +12.6% | -6.3% |
| 6M | +10.4% | -28.3% | +38.7% | +15.4% |
| YTD | +48.6% | -33.5% | +82.1% | +56.0% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | -41.5% | +109.5% | +80.5% |
| All | +206.9% | -10.5% | +217.4% | +182.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling