+200.1%
PWR vs LDOS
+39.7%
+160.4%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +0.5% | +0.2% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -5.4% | +9.0% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +4.9% | -13.5% | -9.6% |
| 3M | -13.2% | +7.2% | -20.3% | -14.3% |
| 6M | +9.9% | -24.2% | +34.1% | +19.2% |
| YTD | +48.0% | -25.8% | +73.8% | +60.2% |
| 1Y | +66.2% | -24.7% | +90.9% | +79.1% |
| All | +200.1% | +39.7% | +160.4% | +143.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling