+200.1%
PWR vs GLDM
+128.8%
+71.4%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -0.9% | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -0.5% | +4.1% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +4.4% | -13.0% | -9.8% |
| 3M | -13.2% | -1.1% | -12.1% | -13.2% |
| 6M | +9.9% | -13.7% | +23.6% | +13.0% |
| YTD | +48.0% | +2.8% | +45.3% | +46.1% |
| 1Y | +66.2% | +24.8% | +41.3% | +57.7% |
| All | +200.1% | +128.8% | +71.4% | +140.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling