+206.9%
PWR vs EOG
+22.2%
+184.7%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | +1.1% | -3.0% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -1.3% | +4.0% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -5.1% | +3.4% | -8.5% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -9.4% | +7.8% | -17.2% | -10.8% |
| 6M | +10.4% | +13.4% | -2.9% | +6.6% |
| YTD | +48.6% | +43.5% | +5.2% | +34.5% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | +29.7% | +38.3% | +56.5% |
| All | +206.9% | +22.2% | +184.7% | +182.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling