+202.9%
PWR vs ENPH
-69.9%
+272.7%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | +0.4% | -1.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.2% | +1.5% | -1.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -12.9% | +5.1% | -6.3% |
| 3M | -4.9% | -27.1% | +22.2% | -1.9% |
| 6M | +9.7% | -15.4% | +25.2% | +10.6% |
| YTD | +46.7% | +15.0% | +31.7% | +41.5% |
| 1Y | +58.7% | -0.7% | +59.4% | +54.9% |
| All | +202.9% | -69.9% | +272.7% | +234.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling