+141.2%
PSX vs NIO
-64.6%
+205.8%
-44.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -1.6% | +1.7% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -13.0% | +17.6% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +26.6% | -18.3% | +44.9% | +27.6% |
| 3M | +39.3% | -33.2% | +72.5% | +41.5% |
| 6M | +56.8% | -21.5% | +78.3% | +57.5% |
| YTD | +101.8% | -25.5% | +127.3% | +103.1% |
| 1Y | +99.6% | -38.0% | +137.6% | +102.7% |
| All | +141.2% | -64.6% | +205.8% | +149.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling