+50.4%
PRU vs EPAM
-33.7%
+84.1%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -3.9% | +1.2% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +2.4% | +13.4% | -11.0% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +6.1% | +47.1% | -41.0% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +71.2% | -71.9% | -9.3% |
| 6M | +22.1% | +48.9% | -26.9% | +13.0% |
| YTD | +9.8% | -22.2% | +32.0% | +13.8% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | -5.2% | +24.5% | +19.1% |
| 3Y | +50.4% | -34.9% | +85.3% | +47.8% |
| All | +50.4% | -33.7% | +84.1% | +47.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling