+56.3%
PRU vs ARMK
+96.6%
-40.3%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +0.1% | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +3.6% | +2.7% | +0.9% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +8.9% | -1.5% | +10.3% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +0.2% | -11.6% | +11.7% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +23.7% | +6.7% | +17.0% | +20.0% |
| YTD | +13.7% | +47.4% | -33.7% | -2.2% |
| 1Y | +20.6% | +41.5% | -20.9% | +5.2% |
| 3Y | +56.3% | +95.5% | -39.2% | +31.2% |
| All | +56.3% | +96.6% | -40.3% | +31.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling