+94.9%
PR vs LNT
+67.4%
+27.6%
-39.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.5% | +0.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +6.0% | +1.0% | +4.9% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -4.2% | +9.6% | -13.8% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +10.0% | +5.4% | +4.6% | +9.3% |
| 6M | +15.6% | +3.1% | +12.5% | +15.2% |
| YTD | +68.2% | +16.5% | +51.7% | +64.3% |
| 1Y | +79.2% | +12.3% | +66.9% | +75.9% |
| 3Y | +94.9% | +70.3% | +24.6% | +84.9% |
| All | +94.9% | +67.4% | +27.6% | +84.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling