+55.9%
PPL vs ENPH
-65.3%
+121.2%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -5.4% | +4.9% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -7.6% | +5.4% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +1.7% | -16.4% | +18.1% | +1.7% |
| 3M | +0.1% | -34.3% | +34.4% | +0.3% |
| 6M | -1.5% | -28.5% | +27.0% | -1.7% |
| YTD | +3.0% | -16.4% | +19.4% | +2.1% |
| 1Y | -1.4% | -12.8% | +11.4% | -2.4% |
| All | +55.9% | -65.3% | +121.2% | +50.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling