-60.9%
PODD vs NIO
-38.9%
-22.0%
-62.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -2.4% | -0.7% | -3.1% |
| 7D | -6.9% | -4.1% | -2.8% | -7.0% |
| 30D | -3.5% | -23.2% | +19.8% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -13.6% | -29.9% | +16.3% | -14.4% |
| 6M | -42.6% | -25.1% | -17.5% | -43.8% |
| YTD | -51.5% | -27.5% | -24.0% | -52.3% |
| 1Y | -60.9% | -41.1% | -19.8% | -61.3% |
| All | -60.9% | -38.9% | -22.0% | -61.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling