-78.4%
PLUG vs HTZ
-81.0%
+2.5%
-88.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.5% | -20.8% | +13.3% | -3.8% |
| 7D | -4.9% | -7.7% | +2.8% | -3.7% |
| 30D | -27.4% | -13.1% | -14.3% | -25.9% |
| 3M | -35.7% | +14.7% | -50.5% | -38.6% |
| 6M | -59.3% | -70.6% | +11.3% | -51.7% |
| YTD | -31.5% | -65.2% | +33.7% | -22.6% |
| 1Y | -48.9% | -73.2% | +24.3% | -39.4% |
| All | -78.4% | -81.0% | +2.5% | -67.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling