+135.5%
PLTU vs EPAM
-53.7%
+189.2%
-79.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.0% | -2.4% | -6.7% | -6.9% |
| 7D | -13.6% | +2.0% | -15.5% | -14.8% |
| 30D | +16.7% | +6.5% | +10.1% | +9.1% |
| 3M | +29.6% | +19.9% | +9.6% | +8.5% |
| 6M | -0.1% | -16.9% | +16.8% | +17.4% |
| YTD | -31.5% | -42.9% | +11.4% | +7.9% |
| 1Y | -19.7% | -30.4% | +10.6% | -1.4% |
| All | +135.5% | -53.7% | +189.2% | +386.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling