+124.5%
PLTU vs BIIB
+35.9%
+88.6%
-79.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -3.8% | -0.9% | -4.7% |
| 7D | -11.6% | -1.6% | -9.9% | -11.5% |
| 30D | -4.6% | +2.2% | -6.8% | -4.5% |
| 3M | +33.7% | +10.3% | +23.4% | +34.7% |
| 6M | -9.4% | +14.9% | -24.3% | -8.7% |
| YTD | -34.7% | +20.7% | -55.5% | -34.5% |
| 1Y | -23.2% | +50.3% | -73.6% | -26.5% |
| All | +124.5% | +35.9% | +88.6% | +60.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling