+135.5%
PLTU vs ACM
-40.2%
+175.8%
-79.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.0% | -0.4% | -8.6% | -8.6% |
| 7D | -13.6% | -3.7% | -9.8% | -9.9% |
| 30D | +16.7% | -11.1% | +27.8% | +31.4% |
| 3M | +29.6% | -8.0% | +37.5% | +39.0% |
| 6M | -0.1% | -29.7% | +29.6% | +53.1% |
| YTD | -31.5% | -29.4% | -2.1% | -1.7% |
| 1Y | -19.7% | -46.4% | +26.7% | +90.5% |
| All | +135.5% | -40.2% | +175.8% | +259.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling