+135.5%
PLTU vs ABCL
+274.8%
-139.2%
-79.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.0% | -1.2% | -7.8% | -8.5% |
| 7D | -13.6% | +0.7% | -14.3% | -13.7% |
| 30D | +16.7% | +93.1% | -76.4% | -19.3% |
| 3M | +29.6% | +79.4% | -49.9% | -10.4% |
| 6M | -0.1% | +214.9% | -215.0% | -50.8% |
| YTD | -31.5% | +234.2% | -265.7% | -67.9% |
| 1Y | -19.7% | +174.8% | -194.5% | -59.2% |
| All | +135.5% | +274.8% | -139.2% | -18.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling