+1,046.2%
PLTR vs ZETA
+280.9%
+765.2%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -4.1% | -0.4% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +2.7% | -9.1% | -7.1% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +15.8% | -5.8% | +5.3% |
| 3M | +23.0% | +35.4% | -12.4% | +11.9% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +67.1% | -53.3% | -2.9% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +54.1% | -56.0% | -15.2% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | +67.8% | -56.2% | -6.8% |
| All | +1,046.2% | +280.9% | +765.2% | +459.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling