+973.7%
PLTR vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+1,073.6%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +4.0% | -4.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -4.1% | +4.2% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -22.7% | +19.5% | -3.7% |
| 3M | +28.4% | -62.5% | +90.9% | +29.8% |
| 6M | +8.4% | -99.5% | +107.8% | +1.3% |
| YTD | -4.6% | -99.7% | +95.1% | -11.7% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | -99.9% | +104.3% | -4.7% |
| All | +973.7% | -100.0% | +1,073.6% | +850.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling