+950.4%
PLTR vs SCCO
+178.0%
+772.4%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -7.2% | +5.1% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -9.1% | -2.7% | -6.4% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -0.2% | -5.0% | -5.8% |
| 3M | +27.4% | +17.8% | +9.6% | +17.9% |
| 6M | +9.7% | +2.3% | +7.5% | +5.7% |
| YTD | -6.7% | +41.6% | -48.3% | -24.1% |
| 1Y | -0.5% | +101.9% | -102.4% | -32.5% |
| All | +950.4% | +178.0% | +772.4% | +431.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling