+1,046.2%
PLTR vs RGEN
+0.8%
+1,045.4%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -1.2% | -3.3% | -4.2% |
| 7D | -6.4% | -4.9% | -1.5% | -5.3% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +5.7% | +4.4% | +8.4% |
| 3M | +23.0% | +32.4% | -9.4% | +13.3% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +33.2% | -19.4% | +3.9% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +2.3% | -4.2% | -3.8% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | +39.0% | -27.3% | +0.4% |
| All | +1,046.2% | +0.8% | +1,045.4% | +1,133.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling