+950.4%
PLTR vs NRG
+198.7%
+751.8%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NRG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -3.2% | +1.1% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -9.1% | -0.2% | -9.0% | -9.2% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -6.8% | +1.6% | -3.8% |
| 3M | +27.4% | -7.1% | +34.5% | +23.9% |
| 6M | +9.7% | -27.6% | +37.3% | +16.2% |
| YTD | -6.7% | -29.2% | +22.5% | -1.5% |
| 1Y | -0.5% | -29.9% | +29.4% | +4.9% |
| All | +950.4% | +198.7% | +751.8% | +275.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NRG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NRG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NRG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NRG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling