+1,025.6%
PLTR vs LPLA
+50.5%
+975.1%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -2.5% | +0.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -2.1% | -3.3% | -4.4% |
| 30D | -1.0% | -3.3% | +2.4% | +0.5% |
| 3M | +24.8% | +23.5% | +1.3% | +12.7% |
| 6M | +8.4% | +12.0% | -3.6% | +1.2% |
| YTD | -4.2% | -1.7% | -2.5% | -4.9% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | +3.2% | +5.9% | +5.5% |
| 3Y | +1,025.6% | +46.2% | +979.4% | +961.5% |
| All | +1,025.6% | +50.5% | +975.1% | +961.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling