+774.7%
PLTR vs LMT
+48.5%
+726.2%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +0.4% | +2.5% | -2.1% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -17.5% | +19.2% | -36.7% | -18.7% |
| 3M | -1.5% | +2.7% | -4.1% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +25.9% | +20.6% | +5.3% | +24.0% |
| YTD | -3.0% | +28.4% | -31.4% | -3.7% |
| 1Y | -9.7% | +36.9% | -46.6% | -10.7% |
| All | +774.7% | +48.5% | +726.2% | +761.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling