+44.4%
PLTR vs KRMN
+32.3%
+12.1%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -0.7% | -1.6% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -3.4% | -1.9% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -1.0% | -31.8% | +30.8% | +11.8% |
| 3M | +24.8% | -20.0% | +44.8% | +32.9% |
| 6M | +8.4% | -60.5% | +68.9% | +44.0% |
| YTD | -4.2% | -45.8% | +41.6% | +11.1% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | -36.4% | +45.5% | +18.4% |
| All | +44.4% | +32.3% | +12.1% | -5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling