+928.7%
PLTR vs IBIT
+44.5%
+884.2%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IBIT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -4.5% | +4.0% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +10.7% | -6.2% | +16.9% | +13.6% |
| 30D | -17.8% | -14.4% | -3.4% | -12.1% |
| 3M | +0.3% | +12.5% | -12.1% | -4.5% |
| 6M | +26.2% | -11.9% | +38.0% | +32.2% |
| YTD | -3.5% | -18.7% | +15.2% | +3.1% |
| 1Y | -6.8% | -29.9% | +23.1% | +5.2% |
| All | +928.7% | +44.5% | +884.2% | +704.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBIT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBIT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBIT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBIT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling