+736.0%
PLTR vs HTZ
-81.0%
+816.9%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.7% | -20.8% | +11.1% | -8.2% |
| 7D | -21.1% | -7.7% | -13.4% | -20.6% |
| 30D | -19.3% | -13.1% | -6.2% | -18.6% |
| 3M | -2.2% | +14.7% | -16.9% | -4.2% |
| 6M | +14.0% | -70.6% | +84.6% | +22.1% |
| YTD | -12.8% | -65.2% | +52.4% | -8.7% |
| 1Y | -17.5% | -73.2% | +55.7% | -11.9% |
| All | +736.0% | -81.0% | +816.9% | +923.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling