-8.4%
PLTR vs GLDM
+1.8%
-10.2%
-44.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -0.8% | +4.3% | +3.8% |
| 7D | -12.9% | +4.7% | -17.5% | -14.8% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -0.9% | -16.5% | -17.0% |
| 3M | +2.9% | -4.3% | +7.2% | +4.6% |
| 6M | +19.9% | -13.4% | +33.3% | +26.7% |
| YTD | -9.8% | -5.8% | -4.0% | -13.0% |
| 1Y | -8.4% | +2.1% | -10.4% | -22.1% |
| All | -8.4% | +1.8% | -10.2% | -22.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling